The European Parliament’s Policy Dept. A has provided a tax policy paper upon the request of the TAXE Special Committee of European Parliament. An EY summary, and detailed report, are provided for reference:
Click to access 2015G_CM5880_European%20Parliament%20publishes%20paper%20on%20the%20EU%20Third-Country%20Tax-Governance%20Issues.pdf
Click to access IPOL_IDA(2015)563449_EN.pdf
- Developing country tax governance issues
- Tax system trends and challenges
- Impact of tax havens on EU countries
- Challenges faced by tax policy makers
- Exchange of information
- Tax transparency
- Illicit activities
- Harmful tax competition
As the EU has stepped in to take the lead on various post-BEPS initiatives, this policy paper is recommended reading to gauge the trend in these topics that will also take place worldwide.
EY’s survey of nearly 100 jurisdictions provides timely insight into unilateral activities and required legislative efforts to implement OECD BEPS Actions 8-10, transfer pricing guidelines, and Action13, transfer pricing documentation / country-by-country (CbC) reporting.
A link to the survey is provided for reference:
Click to access EY-country-implementation-of-beps-actions-8-10-and-13.pdf
- OECD TP Guidelines:
- 7 countries (including the UK) to adopt the changes without need for legislative/administrative action
- 54 countries refer to OECD TP Guidelines by tax authorities/courts for interpretation, but are not binding
- 21 countries refer to OECD TP Guidelines in domestic legislation
- TP Guidelines are meant to be an extension of the Commentary to the arm’s length principle in Article 9; if the revised Guidelines go beyond such rules a change in existing treaties will be required for implementation, although the multilateral instrument in development under Action 15 may remedy this
- Tax authorities have used BEPS initiatives for leverage in Australia, Spain, Hungary, New Zealand, Finland, Indonesia, France and India
- TP and CbC documentation may be provided as an exchange of information if they are “foreseeably relevant”
- Legislative action will be required in most countries with current TP legislation to implement Master / Local File requirements
- Most countries will require a change in law for CbC reporting; 38 countries are/will have such implementation legislation, 49 countries are not yet known, while only 11 countries are not expected to implement in the short/medium term
- CbC information will be widely exchanged via exchange of information articles in double-tax treaties, tax information exchange agreements or Article 6 of the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (and the corresponding Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement)
The survey is a “must read” for interested parties that will be affected by OECD Actions 8-10 and 13; it magnifies the imperative of collecting such information timely and is not dependent on which countries adopt certain provisions the first year (as information will be exchanged quickly around the world regardless of which jurisdiction the parent entity resides in).
A anti-abuse rule has been proposed by the EU Economic and Financial Affairs Council for inclusion in the EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive (PSD), following implementation of hybrid mismatch rules as summarized in my post of 24 June 2014. The proposal would be required to legislated into law by 31 December 2015, in addition to the earlier hybrid loan rules.
A copy of the communique is attached for reference:
Annex I contains the following language (highlights added for emphasis) for the proposed anti-abuse rule:
Member States shall not grant the benefits of this Directive to an arrangement or a series of arrangements that, having been put into place for the main purpose or one of the main purposes of obtaining a tax advantage which defeats the object or purpose of this Directive, are not genuine having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances. An arrangement may comprise more than one step or part. 3. For the purposes of paragraph 2, an arrangement or a series of arrangements shall be regarded as not genuine to the extent that they are not put into place for valid commercial reasons which reflect economic reality. 4. This Directive shall not preclude the application of domestic or agreement-based provisions required for the prevention of tax evasion, tax fraud or abuse.”
Annex II provides further reference stating that EU Member States will endeavor to inform each other, and additionally that an anti-abuse provision will be considered in future work addressing the EU Interest and Royalties Directive 2003/49/EC.
This proposal should be closely followed, as it will directly affect transactions between EU Member States. Additionally, this initiative will be followed by other countries in drafting domestic and/or treaty anti-abuse/anti-avoidance rules, possibly resulting in a multi-pronged approach of anti-avoidance / anti-abuse rules in Directives, treaties and domestic legislation.
The subjectivity of this rule will increase complexity, reduce clarity and certainty while being subject to further appeals contesting implementation and/or interpretation of the guidelines, including the “main purpose” test.
The OECD Task Force’s role is to advise the OECD Committees in delivering a Tax and Development Programme focused on developing countries. Co-chaired by South Africa and the Netherlands, its members include OECD and developing countries, business, and regional/international organisations.
Click to access taskforce-tax-development-korea-outcome-statement.pdf
The annual meeting was held 30-31 October in Seoul, Korea, with the following points of emphasis.
- State building, accountability and effective capacity development, including governance of tax incentives and a feasibility study on Tax Inspectors Without Borders initiative (9 June post)
- More effective transfer pricing regimes in developing countries, with country initiatives in Columbia, Ghana, Honduras, Kenya, Rwanda, Tanzania and Vietnam developed in partnership with the EU and World Bank.
- Increased transparency in the reporting of financial data by MNEs, identifying Best Practices while monitoring developments of the Dodd-Frank Act and proposals for revising the EU Transparency Directive.
- Countering international tax evasion/avoidance and improving transparency and exchange of information, preparing countries for peer reviews by the Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information and developing exchange of information projects in Kenya and Ghana.
The report provides added value with numerous links to referenced initiatives (i.e., Tax Inspectors Without Borders, EU Transparency Directive) for a comprehensive understanding of the multiple initiatives being developed.
This link provides access to the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters prescribing procedures for the exchange of information between tax authorities, in addition to press releases and related documents.
The Convention, and its provisions, are becoming more important with increased tax transparency and sharing of Best Practices among tax jurisdictions. The Multilateral Convention, as well as factors leading to its current and future importance provide valuable context in understanding the current state of affairs, and intentions to increase the exchange of information worldwide.
The Global Forum has 120 members and is the premier international body re: implementation of internationally agreed transparency standards and exchange of information. This Forum is very active in today’s tax environment, as demonstrated by its recent activities including:
- 2nd meeting of the Competent Authorities on 30-31 May 2013, attended by 174 delegates from 77 jurisdictions. Delegates shared procedures for Exchange of Information networks to tackle tax evasion, tools to enhance effective communication between Competent Authorities, as well as providing opportunities to share experiences and practices.
- Regional Training Seminar in Brazil 7-10 May 2013, attended by 70 tax administrators from Argentina, Brazil, Columbia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Paraguay and Uruguay. Panama and the United Kingdom provided expert trainers, focusing on an OECD overview of Exchange of Information, the 2012 update to Article 26 of the OECD Model Tax Convention and its Commentary, and the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance.
- Regional Training Seminar in Dakar, Senegal 24-26 April 2013, attended by 20 tax authorities in 8 francophone African countries (Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Democratic Republic of Congo, Gabon, Morocco, Niger, Senegal and Tunisia). The African countries are recent members of the Global Forum and will have Phase 1 peer reviews in 2014. Belgium and Qatar provided expert trainers, focusing on the peer review process and preparation for evaluation of legal and regulatory frameworks for the exchange of information.
The activities of this Forum are visibly expanding transparency initiatives and the exchange of information around the world. The recent G8 conference encouraged all countries to join in order to share mutual benefits.
Regional and global tax teams should review internal processes to ensure global consistency and adherence with internal governance protocols. Additionally, a dialogue should be established between tax and the business leaders to heighten global awareness and ensure strategic alignment.
Click to access taxtransparency_G8report.pdf
This OECD report entitled “A Step Change in Tax Transparency” was prepared for the G8 meeting and summarizes recent developments, action plans for global automatic exchange of information and a feasibility assessment.
In today’s tax environment the exchange of tax information is quickly evolving and gaining momentum. This report provides valuable context for discussion.