As Final Regulations are in process, TEI’s practical and thoughtful comments were submitted re: the proposed Section 250 Regulations. A copy of the comments are provided for reference, with highlights including:
- Determination of domestic and foreign use are impractical rules for which a multinational company will find difficult to effectively implement. A seller’s shipping address would be an alternative solution
- Long-term supply contracts may be difficult to obtain new documentation annually, thus such documentation of the initial contract should suffice
- Business Service provisions have rules that will prove difficult to obtain, workable rules should be designed and implemented
- Effective date of the final regulations should be tax years beginning at least one year after the date of publication, to allow time for system changes
- Final section 250 regulations should provide that the exploitation of manufacturing and supply chain IP is a foreign used service, consumed at the place of manufacture, if it meets the physical transformation and proximity requirements outlined in the regulations
- Advance payments of section 451 are to be related to the timing for related cost of goods sold amounts to prevent distortion
-
Final regulations clarify where the charitable contribution deduction limitation fits in the ordering rule, along with sections 163(j), 172, and 250.
- Prop. Treas. Reg. § 1.250(b)-1(d)(2) provides that the exclusive apportionment rules in Treas. Reg. § 1.861–17(b) do not apply, this provision is a disincentive and should be changed
TEI’s comments are informative, especially due to the inclusion of suggested alternatives to the proposed rules and therefore worth reviewing.
Leave a Reply