Argentina has eased its foreign exchange controls, effective this month. The changes affect imports, services, repatriations and bank controls. Deloitte’s International Tax Alert provides further details:
Foreign exchange controls are important to monitor, as they affect transfer pricing, cash funding/repatriation, timing of reimbursements and contemporaneous documentation requirements for clearance. Argentina’s announcement is good news for international business, and it is hopeful that other countries with similar controls follow their lead.
Tax and treasury practices should be integrated with respect to foreign exchange controls to gain maximum efficiencies in any organization.
India’s Ministry of Finance has issued draft guiding principles for determining the place of effective management (POEM). The Finance Act of 2015 contained provisions providing for the significant change in determining POEM, to be effective April 2016. The guidelines have a comment period until 2 January 2016; a link to the guidelines is provided:
The guidelines present subjective determinations of determining POEM based on substance over form and a recurring annual test. There are presumptions, such as location for a majority of Board meetings, with exceptions based on facts and circumstances.
As drafted, the new guidelines present increased uncertainty for multinationals having any operations or services with Indian residents, thus this latest report should merit high priority due to the April 2016 effective date, as well as brief period provided for comments.
Brazil has placed Dutch holding companies back on its list of privileged tax regimes, as it has determined that such companies that do not have “substantial economic activity” will be subject to adverse Brazilian tax consequences. EY’s Global Tax Alert provides additional details:
Best Practices: All multinationals should review not only Dutch holding companies, but all holding companies to test economic substance. Russia has enacted recent rules on beneficial ownership, also looking at economic substance to determine the availability of treaty benefits. Other countries are expected to be more active in this subjective determination, thus this will be a topic for disputes gong forward.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays to all: best wishes for a healthy, happy and joyous holiday season!
All the best,
The US Treasury has released proposed Regulations setting forth details for country-by-country (CbC) reporting by US-based multinationals. A link to the proposed Reg’s is provided:
The proposed Reg’s have been issued for comment, and two significant timing issues arise in the current version:
- Final Regulations would not take effect until tax years beginning after publication in the Federal Register, which would be 2017 for calendar-year taxpayers.
- The CbC report would be submitted to IRS with the US corporate income tax return, due Sept. 15.
Although the proposed Reg’s are conformed to the OECD model and have been purposeful in its comments on confidentiality and the exchange of information provisions for CbC reporting, the timing mismatch for the 2016 tax year presents a complexity that hopefully will be overcome in the Final Regulations. If no changes are made to the effective date, the 2016 tax year would be a dysfunctional method of reporting around the world, based on whom are considered surrogate entities or determining which countries have rules that provide for direct submission to their tax authorities absent a US requirement.
Additionally, the submission of the CbC report by Sept. 15 accelerates the year-end timing envisioned by the OECD. This acceleration should be expected by multinationals, thereby leaving less time to coordinate and review the information via developing an efficient and sustainable CbC reporting process.
The US House and Senate have paved the way for the President’s signature on a bill that extends important international tax topics:
- Subpart F active financing exception – permanent extension
- 5-year extension of the CFC look-through rule (through 2019)
A summary of the bill is provided in EY’s Global Tax Alert:
Separately, the US has also indicated that regulations should be forthcoming before year-end for the country-by-country (CbC) reporting rules, which is good news for many.
These rules should provide some international tax certainty for US-based companies, notwithstanding the absence of significant reform for the worldwide tax system.
The French Parliament has approved the 2016 Finance bill, subject to constitutional review. A summary of the provisions are provided in EY’s Global Alert:
- Country-by-Country (CbC) reporting is adopted for French parented multinational companies, consistent with OECD Guidelines.
- Compulsory e-filing.
- Annual filing of transfer pricing documentation.
- Effective 1/1/2016, intra-French distributions will be subject to a 1% taxable income inclusion, as well as distributions received from EU or EEA qualifying subsidiaries.
- The general anti-abuse clause of the amended EU Parent-Subsidiary Directive is adopted.
- The 2015 AFB amends the French participation exemption regime, as well as the withholding tax (WHT) treatment applicable to dividends distributed by French entities to EU resident entities, in order to comply with the EU Directive 2011/96/UE dated 30 November 2011.
The new rules pose additional burdens for distributions within a French tax group, while recognizing CbC reporting and being proactive with respect to the filing of transfer pricing documentation. Accordingly, it should be followed as other countries adopt similar rules in the near future.