Strategizing International Tax Best Practices – by Keith Brockman

EY’s notice provides details re: an opportunity to receive a refund of the 5% French tax for dividends received from EU subsidiaries.  The French rule was not consistent with the freedom of establishment principle of EU law.

A refund of such French taxes can be filed for taxes paid within the last two years. 

The 3% dividend tax for dividend distributions by a French parent to a non-EU subsidiary, versus intra-group French dividends, may encounter discrimination challenges due to its dissimilar application.

Accordingly, protective refunds should also be considered re: the French 3% dividend tax and similar EU  unilateral legislative provisions to ensure potential opportunities are not lost due to timing as to when the taxes were paid.  

http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/CJEU_holds_French_taxation_of_EU-source_dividends_incompatible_with_EU_law/$FILE/2015G_CM5739_CJEU%20holds%20French%20taxation%20of%20EU-source%20dividend%20incompatible%20with%20EU.pdf

“On 2 September 2015, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rendered its decision on the Steria case, relating to the French taxation of dividends from European Union (EU) subsidiaries. The CJEU ruled that fully exempting dividends received from French, tax consolidated subsidiaries, but including a 5% fraction of dividends received from EU subsidiaries in the French taxable income, amounted to a discrimination infringing the freedom of establishment.”

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: